Well at the moment none we tried putting a spare 12v fan from an older pc but no luck yet pretty bad emergency as front case fans not work yet either due to some other issue hes had with that we know the pc boots as can play games etc just cant get the wiring right. Do you think the 1660 will be fine or should I go for the ti, I’m really trying to budget I only want to go for the ti if I’m going to have performance issues when streaming. The only thing is my current main board is an old GA-F2A68HM-HD2 with an AMD A10 CPU. Indeed, whereas the GTX 1660 has a memory bandwidth of 192GB/s, the Ti’s is a whopping 288GB/s. Well, you will face CPU bottleneck with GTX 1660 in high CPU intensive games especially at 1080p resolution. aorus b450 elite mobo and so far just a 1tb hard drive for windows. I will game mostly in 1080p / 60hz..If in future i decided to buy a 144hz monitor which card would be good? I think you are pretty good with your current processor. I want mostly want 10 bit color for Graphic work and open GL. To help me, I’ve got Gigabyte’s GeForce GTX 1660 OC and the Asus GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Phoenix editions, which are both at the lower end of their respective price brackets of £200 / $220 and £260 / $280 respectively. I do appreciate any help you can give. The games in question include Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Assassin’s Creed Odyssey, Metro Exodus, Final Fantasy XV (with Nvidia’s fancy HairWorks, TurfEffects, VXAO and ShadowLibs effects turned off), Monster Hunter: World, Total War: Warhammer II, The Witcher III and Forza Horizon 4, giving us a nice spread of big blockbuster games from the last couple of years right up to present day. Notify me by email when the comment gets approved. Many of the PC users and gamers are in dilemma that whether they should go the top of the range GTX 1660 Ti, or is it a better idea to save some money for other components or upgrades, and go for its younger brother, which is GTX 1660. both these wont give 144 fps right? Well, It is really hard to choose between these two graphics cards, especially for 1080p gaming, as both of them are quite capable of running latest games at ultra-graphics settings at 1080p with 60 FPS or more on average. If you click our links to online stores and make a purchase we may receive a few pennies. Any help appreciated. Right now, the GTX 1660 Ti is my top 1080p gaphic card recommendation, while the regular GTX 1660 is the card I reckon ‘you should actually buy’ if you’re less fussed about playing at 60fps on max settings. GTX 1660 Ti is a pretty powerful card and can handle 4K footage quite easily. They come with Nvidia’s new NVEC Encoder that delivers 15% improved efficiency over previous generation Nvidia graphics cards and is optimized for Open Broadcaster Software (OBS). It even poses a real challenge to the Vega 56 in some cases. The best cheap configuration that I can suggest you for upgrade is as follows: Hi Akshat, So do you think this GTX 1660 TI would be ok for me playing back smooth 4k footage and also maybe this card is Future proof for a few years. Just like my GTX 1660 Ti vs GTX 1060 and GTX 1660 Ti vs RTX 2060 articles, I’ve put each card up against my general games benchmarking suite at 1920×1080 and 2560×1440 resolutions to see how they perform across different graphics quality settings. Also, use Nvidia Studio Drivers for 10-bit color support. Meanwhile, the difference between the GPUs remained consistent on the Hitmanbenchmark (Ultra, 1080p), as the GTX 1660 Ti nai… Fortnite was tested with the built in benchmark using ultra settings, I found both cards to deliver a fairly playable experience with ultra settings, even with 1440p, however the Ti … Corsair 275R Airflow Mid-tower case. Thanks for the appreciation and you are always welcome. https://petapixel.com/2019/07/29/nvidia-unveils-new-studio-driver-with-support-for-10-bit-color-for-creatives/. Does this CPU & GPU combo run on 60 Hz or it does not matter for Graphics. While it can do a pretty good job across Medium to High settings now, in a couple of years time, I wouldn’t be surprised if it ended up more of a Low to Medium card instead. 16gb corsair vengeance rgb ram 2x 8 sticks. My build is intel I5-9400F, 16gb ram, 550w Corsair psu, MSI gaming plus motherboard. However, GTX 1660 is a cut down version of the TU116 and has got lesser CUDA cores than GTX 1660 Ti. Unless, of course, you’ve also got a 2560×1440 monitor at your disposal, in which case you might want to consider spending the extra on the GTX 1660 Ti here. Zotac is very respectable brand and I have used many cards from it without any problems. The AMP comes with a slightly better cooler, higher clocks and will also cost you more. (*This post may contain affiliate links, which means I may receive a small commission if you choose to purchase through links I provide (at no extra cost to you). Thanks again, i will price it out in US. GDDR 6. The content is copyrighted and should not be reproduced on other websites. if i go with nividia line then everything shd be nvidia bcoz my friends back in 2010 faced this same issue with different manufactures…do we have a good gsync monitor with 144hz option not breaking the wallet? The GTX 1660 Ti averaged 43 fps on the Rise of the Tomb Raidertest (Very High, 1080p), leaving the GTX 1650 below our 30 fps playability threshold at 29 fps (48.3% increase in performance). I am glad that I have found your website it is helping me trying to decide on the best graphics card for my budget. It will definitely do 10 bit for each channel in RGB. The GTX 1660 also has fewer CUDA cores than its Ti sibling (1408 vs 1536), which are a bit like the cores you get in your CPU, but for graphics calculations. Both these graphics cards are based on Turing GPU architecture and use the same TU116 core. For those whose main concern is just at the 1080p end of the spectrum, however, I reckon the regular GTX 1660 should do you just fine. Thank you for helping me with this I have decided to purchase the MSI Nvidia GTX 1660TI Gaming X 6G This looks the perfect card for me. All new GPUs have been announced for desktops at the following price: Nvidia GTX 1650 – Rs. I dont know we might have some compatible issue later on,. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. Thank you for your reply. What graphics card do you have? Cyberpunk 2077 guides. in Computer Science & Engineering. So, to clear this confusion out, here I am going to compare both these graphics cards on different parameters, so that you can have a more complete idea about them, and can make a well informed decision on buying your new graphics card. Again, a lot of people will probably be more than happy with that kind of performance in the here and now, but I do worry about the GTX 1660’s overall longevity as a 1440p card as games become even more demanding in the years to come. Best Minecraft shaders Here are some of the best GTX 1660 Ti cards in the market https://graphicscardhub.com/best-gtx-1660-ti/. Thank you for supporting the work I put into this site!). 5.44 TFLOPS vs 5.196 TFLOPS As a result, the GTX 1660 should still be a good high refresh rate partner for less demanding games, such as Apex Legends, Fortnite and the like, but you may have to make do with Medium settings if you want the same speeds in today’s big, graphics intensive blockbusters. I hope i can get this done for under $1500 to $2000. The 1660 Ti follows up with between 15 and 25 percent lower frame rates, though it does beat important AMD competitors like the RX 590. I want cheapest 10bit 4k graphic art with this software. With that, we will find out if Gddr5 to Gddr6 brings a lot of performance. New PC games 2020 Seagate Barracuda 2TB HDD is my motherboard the asrock a320m hdv compatible and if it is will it bottleneck the gtx 1660. In terms of raw performance, there’s no question which cards are the more capable. Also, SLI support for these cards is also absent. The Nvidia 1660 Ti and 1660 are bound to replace the GTX 1060 and GTX 1070. hi. To find out, it’s time to look at some tasty graphs. Hello everyone, this is GTX 1050 Ti vs GTX 1660 Test in 12 Games (i5 7400) comparison. The 1660 Ti also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Hey Akshat! Further, the 1660 has a 12% … Samsung 860 Evo 500GB SSD I am sorry to say that this AMD A10 CPU is no match for GTX 1660 Ti and you won’t be able to get the best out of it with this processor. At this budget of £300, you can’t find anything better than this and it will serve you quite well in the future too. Make sure to use Nvidia CRD drivers with this card for professional work. any help would be much grateful for. The power consumption of both these cards is almost the same and is rated at 120W. The faster memory in GTX 1660 Ti helps in high resolution gaming, especially at 1440p, and in applications where memory speed plays an important role in determining the outcome of the result. May be 2 to 3 or 5 FPS extra. MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING X Graphics Card The GTX 1660 Ti, of course, still offers a decent 10-15fps jump over its non-Ti sibling here, but you’re only going to actually see if you’ve got a high refresh rate monitor at your disposal. For 144Hz monitor, I would suggest Acer KG241QP (24-inch, 1080p, FreeSync, TN Panel). Performance was competitive in Counter Strike: GO, the 1660 Ti is clear winner. If you still have any confusion regarding which card to buy, then you can ask me your queries in the comment section below. But what difference does that ‘Ti’ moniker actually make, and is it worth spending the extra £60 / $60 on it? Best PC games When it comes to video memory, then both these two graphics cards come with 6GB VRAM having 192-bit interface, but differ in memory type and speed. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and … Support RPS and get an ad-free site, extra articles, and free stuff. Either way, the GTX 1660 is a fine graphics card in its own right, and is my new recommendation alongside AMD’s Radeon RX 580 for what you should actually buy at 1080p if you’re looking to keep costs down as much as possible. High settings, on the other hand, is much more doable on these cards – particularly in the case of the GTX 1660 Ti, which is able to hit a decent 60fps almost across the board here. Best graphics cards The Gtx 1660 S will be directly compared to the 1660 vanilla and the 1660 Ti. On average, GTX 1660 Ti is around 12% to 15% faster than GTX 1660, which is not a huge margin but the extra FPS gain always come in very handy, especially when too much action is going on in a game at some moment, and you don’t want to face performance lag due to it. Although both these cards are based on Turing GPU architecture, they do not come with RT cores for Real Time Ray Tracing and Tensor cores for AI and DLSS. 600w evga white 80plus psu. All Rights Reserved. Also I usually would go with EVGA, MSI etc the well known brands, what do you think of the cheaper brands like zotac are they reliable, is their build quality good, I’m skeptical of them. In my opinion it is not worth paying extra bucks especially if you are on tight budget. A lower average does, of course, mean that the GTX 1660 is more prone to dipping into slightly more juddery territory when things get a bit tough – Assassin’s Creed Odyssey, for example, had a couple of sub-25fps dips when I ran the GTX 1660 through its internal benchmark, while the GTX 1660 Ti kept its Spartan sandal socks up closer to 30fps. Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 32GB (16GB x 2) 3000MHz RAM When the GTX 1660 and 1660 Ti debuted in early 2019, the obvious differences between them were the nine percent disparity in CUDA cores and the considerably faster memory on the Ti. Ok thanks for the help so far., So buying a base gtx 1660 for 17.5k and a freesync 144hz for 12.5k will resurrect my 2010 rig back to modern life…Also mu processer is i5-760, will i get any major bottleneck when paired with 1660? However, the main area of concern is that the performance and price difference between these graphics cards is not that huge, and this has raised quite a bit of confusion among gamers and buyers. Admittedly neither card is particularly comfortable on Ultra settings at this resolution, but a frame rate in the low 40s is almost certainly going to be noticeably smoother than one in the mid 30s here. Find more information here. GTX 1660 Ti comes with GDDR6 memory at 12Gbps speed, and offers bandwidth of 288 GB/s, while GTX 1660 has got GDDR5 memory running at 8Gbps, offering total bandwidth of 192GB/s, which is significantly less than in GTX 1660 Ti. https://www.pcworld.com/article/3333637/nvidia-driver-freesync-monitor-support-geforce-graphics-cards.html, “Update: Adaptive Sync is only being enabled on GTX 10-series and RTX 20-series graphics cards as well, with no plans to activate it in older GPUs.”. Besides, if Ultra ends up being too much for the GTX 1660, you can still get lovely 60fps+ speeds by knocking the quality settings down to High. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver 8 Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the … Gigabyte B450M DS3H Motherboard (approx £66) The GTX 1660 Ti, on the other hand, is only likely to slip down to Medium to High over long-term use, which I’d argue is probably worth the extra cash in this case. Thanks again for asking , i can do graphics works but deciphering merits of combo is beyond my capacity. However, if you are on very strict budget then it is better to go for the base model or variant of GTX 1660 at $219, but if you can stretch your budget a little bit more, and want to have a shot at 1440p gaming too, then getting a GTX 1660 Ti is an intelligent choice. There is no issue with newer cards. Thanks. Best free PC games Alright cool, so the zotac basic 1660 cost 17800 according to vedant computers website, but i also see msi, Asus , gigabyte cards too, do I’m confused if zotac is better than these… Any idea about that? This game was very smooth, I didn’t see any lags or shutters at medium or even at high settings. (Which is a 4k monitor). So, in this department, there is no winner, as both of them are almost equal in this area. I am a PC Gamer and a Hardware Enthusiast. I am looking for a card for no more than £300 or hopefully less which can handle fast moving 4K go pro footage so I am able to edit it and play it back with no problem. As a result, some cards you see on sale may actually be faster these particular figures, but enough about teensy spec differences – let’s talk teensy frames per second differences instead! parts are ryzen 2700x.